=============================================================== From: Dan Lyke ------------------------------------------------------ On Wed, 9 Feb 2011 09:41:33 -0500 Cameron Kilgore wrote: Given how Google has gone on with such things, In writing about it, Google were careful to stress that web developers should develop sites with progressive enhancement and not rely on JavaScript for it=E2=80=99s content ... is rich with irony. The JavaScript-less web is largely dead. Damn it. Dan
=============================================================== From: Cameron Kilgore ------------------------------------------------------ Last I checked, I didn't think anything but Firefox used WAI-ARIA, so to me= , using Javascript and AJAX to deliver content is a no-go for me. And maybe it'll save bandwidth -- but it just increases the amount of HTTP queries pu= t through on a page. More queries means having to buy more machines or VM instances. Also, this shit kills my back button, which isn't cool.
=============================================================== From: William Wade ------------------------------------------------------ The real problem is with simple sites they don't take the time to make it no-js compatible. When it is there is no need for #! or # or /nojs at all. I have not completely tested it, but my latest site is a good example: www.browsetheriver.com It is all Ajaxy but if you don't have js turned on it should all still work... Should at any rate... On Wed, Feb 9, 2011 at 10:13 AM, Cameron Kilgore w= rote: me, put not
=============================================================== From: Aaron welch ------------------------------------------------------ BTW, I just bought the book that your site referred me to. Looks like a good read! -AW On Wed, Feb 9, 2011 at 10:22 AM, William Wade wrot= e: o be s .
=============================================================== From: Cameron Kilgore ------------------------------------------------------ All I got was 50 dollars worth of Dole Mixed Fruit in a can. ote: to es M : m. t
=============================================================== From: Mike Harrison ------------------------------------------------------ I got an error 406. Never seen that before. Error 406 Not Acceptable An appropriate representation of the requested resource / could not be found on this server. Additionally, a 404 Not Found error was encountered while trying to use an ErrorDocument to handle the request. Then, with Firefox I get: The server at www.browsetheriver.com is taking too long to respond. The third time.. I got a freakish Amazon looking page With a Kid A album on it. I'm not clicking on a scraped/framed/iframed Amazon page..
=============================================================== From: Aaron welch ------------------------------------------------------ I copied and pasted the title into an Amazon search. -AW
=============================================================== From: Cameron Kilgore ------------------------------------------------------ What book?
=============================================================== From: Dave Brockman ------------------------------------------------------ -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 In FF, I got "loading random page from Amazon" and then an Amazon iframe, with the BTR menu on the left side. I closed my browser too. Regards, dtb -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (MingW32) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/ iEYEARECAAYFAk1S804ACgkQABP1RO+tr2QGHACgoLmav20FDtPqX7+aBNk5R/iT vO0AoJ04Imf9aQYd3V2LkkxXS4aPZ0o5 =XHvT -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
=============================================================== From: Cameron Kilgore ------------------------------------------------------ You guys are no fun.
=============================================================== From: William Wade ------------------------------------------------------ The idea is to pull random products from amazon, but there are not any easy ways to do it without an iframe, not and look nice that I could think of. Any ideas? I tried displaying title, image, and description from the API but they don't allow you to pull review stars anymore and not to mention description quality varies greatly. An iframe was all I could think of. .
=============================================================== From: Dave Brockman ------------------------------------------------------ -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Just wasn't what I was expecting, so I did what I always do when a web page comes up unexpected, I closed it. Regards, dtb -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (MingW32) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/ iEYEARECAAYFAk1S+U0ACgkQABP1RO+tr2TX+QCfZ9R+ZnfGS/ksP5kxuankYSyk VNAAoKc3vONWb3fyxa0Z+X3VlUfgYLDz =UJRS -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
=============================================================== From: Dave Brockman ------------------------------------------------------ -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 After thoroughly reading that article, I am so thankful no one cares about anything I throw up on the web these days.... I think I'd rather try to find the longest namespace+method or property available in .NET 4 framework.... or poke myself in the eye with a dull needle. Regards, dtb -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (MingW32) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/ iEYEARECAAYFAk1TZEoACgkQABP1RO+tr2TY3QCgr00jDjJqU2nC+xBombH1XY05 FjwAoJh6hOAzVOZ2FAVDBaGtG4j0xJ6D =dnqE -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----